In March, the first 10,000 pages of Pfizer’s data relating to their vaccine are due for release in the US by the Federal Drug Administration – despite the company having gone back to court twice in hopes of blocking release of said information. Now, according to the New York Times, they are assessing the efficacy of three doses administered to the same age group.
It appears two jabs is not enough, however. Pfizer – another of those companies, behind another of the vaccines, has been testing the efficacy of a two-doses in babies aged from 6 months old to 5 years.
And not just in relation to effects on children, but for effects on recipients of every age. From that moment on – the moment when the needles go into the arms of babies, the companies producing those products are off the hook. It is useful to know that, in the USA, once a government accepts a vaccine for use for all children – and it must be ALL children – then that country’s government accepts, in perpetuity, which is to say forever, all liability for the consequent effects, good or ill, of that vaccine. No one can yet know the truth of it – and yet scarcely has the topic even surfaced on mainstream media. The Europeans Medicines Agency is investigating reports of changes to women’s menstrual cycles, attributed to the vaccines, and suggestions of associated effects on fertility.
Lives ruined.Ĭareful, now – people will say we are paranoid … Just being hesitant about vaccine safety and asking questions about products destined for their bodies … for wanting to wait and see what long term research might reveal … reasonable people are made targets for shame and abuse, sacked from their jobs. Now their names are as familiar as those of characters from the movies.Īcross the world, governments have accepted indemnity so that companies producing the vaccines don’t have to pay compensation in the event of any harm done.Īnd yet people hesitant about vaccine safety are dismissed and vilified as swivel-eyed, tin-hat-wearing conspiracy theorists. Two years ago I had barely heard of Pfizer, Moderna, Astra Zeneca and others. Many people are hesitant, at least, about ALL of the vaccines pushed by ALL of big pharma. It is important to stress this is not just about Johnson and Johnson. Some people are suspicious about the safety of a vaccine from the same company. A history of seeking to keep from the general public, unfavourable information about their products. Plans to off load the problem to a subsidiary company, so as to declare bankruptcy and limit the hit from any damages. Long before the baby powder lawsuits, Johnson and Johnson had faced other legal actions alleging harm caused by other products.Īs I said at the beginning, Johnson and Johnson is the company behind one of the Covid 19 vaccines – and millions of doses of their offering have been injected into millions of people.Ĭarcinogenic asbestos in baby powder. This week Reuters claimed Johnson and Johnson had also investigated the option of shifting the liability from the lawsuits to a separate, newly created subsidiary company which could declare bankruptcy and so limit the impact of any damages resulting from the lawsuits. Pharmaceutical giant Johnson and Johnson – the maker of one of the Covid 19 vaccines – is facing thousands of lawsuits in the US from people claiming its baby powder caused their cancer.įor decades, according to a Reuters news agency investigation, Johnson and Johnson knew their product was sometimes contaminated with asbestos – a substance that can cause cancer – but the company kept that information from industry regulators and the public. Sometimes I wonder if being paranoid isn’t a good thing, in these troubling times.
0 kommentar(er)
