It allows for research into a threat, and you can chart your progress on how you're resolving it." "The most valuable feature is signature-based malware detection." It should protect all kinds of things that might happen on the servers, things that I cannot see." "It is extensive in terms of providing visibility and insights into threats.
We're able to dig in and really understand how things came to be and where to focus our efforts." "I'm only using the AMP (advanced malware protection) which is protecting my file system from all the malicious things that might happen. Because Secure Endpoint has a connection to it, we get protected by it right then and there." "The entirety of our network infrastructure is Cisco and the most valuable feature is the integration." "Device Trajectory is one of the most valuable features. On the backend, Talos checks all the signatures, all the malware, and for any attacks going on around the world. It also has a File Trajectory, so you can even see if that file has been found on any of your other computers that have AMP." "Definitely, the best feature for Cisco Secure Endpoint is the integration with Talos. It shows every running process and file access on the computer and saves it like a snapshot when it detects something malicious. It shows the point in time when a virus is downloaded, so you can see if the user was surfing the internet or had a program open. Sandboxing is helpful, and integration with the Cisco environment is excellent as we use many of their products, and that's very valuable for us." "Another of my favorite features is called the Device Trajectory, where it shows everything that's going on, on a computer. Integration with SecureX is a welcome feature because it connects Cisco's integrated security portfolio with our complete infrastructure.
#BITDEFENDER VS SOPHOS HOME PC#
I can track everything that happens on our server from my PC or device. "appreciate the File Trajectory feature, as it's excellent for an analyst or mobile analyst. It is a secure and powerful solution and received higher marks than Sophos in both the deployment and pricing categories.
Sophos received mixed reviews in the pricing category. Pricing: GravityZone Ultra reviewers feel that it is fairly priced.Sophos reviewers say it is reliable and has good spam filtering and client isolation tools but consumes a lot of processing power. GravityZone Ultra users like its dashboard and say it is secure, user friendly, flexible, and performs well, but needs better reporting features. Features: Users of both products are happy with their stability and scalability.Some Sophos users say that its initial setup is straightforward, while others say that it is complex.
0 kommentar(er)
